Ashfaq Policy & Affairs
search bookmark
Economics

Is Australia Too Dependent on China?

Trade diversification strategies amidst shifting geopolitical tensions and the structural realities of the Australian export economy.

Portrait of Aruba Ashfaq, policy analyst.

Aruba Ashfaq

Strategic Policy Analyst · 2 min read

share Share on X share Share on LinkedIn

1. Introduction

China accounts for roughly a third of Australia's total exports, more than the next four trading partners combined. This concentration raises a persistent policy question: does Australia's prosperity now rest on a relationship it cannot fully control?

2. The Scale of Dependence

Iron ore alone represents a substantial share of export revenue to China, alongside coal, natural gas, agricultural products, and education and tourism services. The 2020–2022 trade disputes over barley, wine, and coal demonstrated both the leverage this dependence gives Beijing and Australia's ability to absorb the shock by redirecting exports elsewhere.

3. Why Diversification Is Hard

China's scale is not easily substituted. India, Japan, and Southeast Asian markets are growing but lack the combined industrial appetite for raw materials that China's manufacturing base provides. Diversification is a multi-decade structural shift, not a policy switch that can be flipped in response to a single diplomatic dispute.

4. What the 2020–2022 Disputes Actually Showed

Despite the trade actions, Australia's overall export revenue continued to grow, as iron ore prices rose and affected commodities found alternative buyers, often at a discount. The episode revealed real resilience, but also real cost: exporters absorbed losses, and some sectors took years to recover market share.

5. Assessment

Dependence on China is best understood as a manageable structural risk rather than an existential one. Australia has demonstrated it can weather targeted disruption, but the cost of that resilience falls unevenly on specific industries and regions, and repeated shocks would erode the margin for absorption.

lightbulb

6. Policy Recommendations

  • Market Diversification Fund: Targeted government support for exporters entering India and ASEAN markets, where relationship-building costs are highest for small and mid-sized firms.
  • Sectoral Stress Testing: Treasury should model exposure scenarios by sector, not just in aggregate, to identify where a future disruption would concentrate damage.
  • Value-Add Investment: Shift incentives toward processing raw commodities domestically before export, reducing reliance on selling unprocessed materials into a single buyer's supply chain.

Published in Strategic Policy Analysis Quarterly, 2026. References available upon request.

Discussion

Get in Touch